Thursday, September 29, 2005

It's that old slippery slope thing....

This is just for those that say homosexual "marriage" will not lead to other strange relational permutations:

First Trio "Married" in The Netherlands

bigamie.jpg
The Netherlands and Belgium were the first countries to give full marriage rights to homosexuals. In the United States some politicians propose "“civil unions" that give homosexual couples the full benefits and responsibilities of marriage. These civil unions differ from marriage only in name.

Meanwhile in the Netherlands polygamy has been legalised in all but name. Last Friday the first civil was registered. Victor de Bruijn (46) from Roosendaal "“married"” both Bianca (31) and Mirjam (35) in a ceremony before a notary who duly registered their civil union.

"“I love both Bianca and Mirjam, so I am marrying them both,"” Victor said. He had previously been married to Bianca. Two and a half years ago they met Mirjam Geven through an internet chatbox. Eight weeks later Mirjam deserted her husband and came to live with Victor and Bianca. After Mirjam'’s divorce the threesome decided to marry.

Victor: "A marriage between three persons is not possible in the Netherlands, but a civil union is. We went to the notary in our marriage costume and exchanged rings. We consider this to be just an ordinary marriage."”

Asked by journalists to tell the secret of their peculiar relationship, Victor explained that there is no jealousy between them. "“But this is because Mirjam and Bianca are bisexual. I think that with two heterosexual women it would be more difficult." Victor stressed, however, that he is "“a one hundred per cent heterosexual"” and that a fourth person will not be allowed into e "“marriage."” They want to take their marriage obligations seriously: "“to be honest and open with each other and not philander."”


Who does that guy look like?

And what if the girls want a little variety? What is this about not allowing a fourth person in the relationship? Oh, that's right. They are bisexual; they have variety. A second man is not needed. Sheesh.

World. Hell. Handbasket.

---Katie

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Well, all we need now is an incestuous relationship to be authorized by a civil union and that will pretty much cover everything sexual (except beastiality).

By the way, they want to be serious about their marriage obligations, yet they didn't seem to mind coaxing someone out of a marriage for their little threesome. Humbuggery at its best.

This is the Europe the American left and the religious left want us to immitate?! Yipes!

Peace!
Rob Buechler, Pastor
Trinity-Bergen/Faith Lutheran Parish
Starkweather, ND

P.S. Our great state has decided to keep a law that makes living together illegal! The legislature said living together is bad for kids, and therefore bad for families; and the state has a compelling interest in supporting monogamous, heterosexual marriage. According to the left, we are a backward state! According to God, we are doing just fine!